LETTER TO MINISTER OF LAW

Yap Chong Yee,
5a Prinsep Road,
Attadale, WA 6156
Date : 2nd June, 2008
Email :ychongyee@yahoo.com.au
Blogg. http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com
To,
Dato Zaid Ibrahim, Minister of Law
Putra Jaya, Malaysia,

Dear YANG AHMAD BERHORMAT,

Re: Re : Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ;
Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd

I have written several letters to the Attorney general, Chief Justice, President & Secretary of Malaysian Bar Council, Sultan of Perak, Minister of Law, and with all copies faxed to Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and many practicing lawyers, and I CHARGE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI WITH COMMITTING the following crimes under the Malaysian criminal code. :

(1)Aiding & abetting the respondents, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon for forgery & Perjury, Perverting the course of justice, obstructing police investigation, aiding & abetting the respondents together with Harris Bin Tun Hussein bin Onn, Lum Siew etc. for obtaining money under false pretences,

(2)I Charge Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for committing Malfeasance.and abuse of her judicial powers.

I also wish to point out what an arsehole JUDGE that Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is, WHEN SHE STRUCT OFF MY WIFE’S CASE ON THE BASIS OF AN APPLICATION THAT WAS SUPPORTED BY AN AFFIDAVIT AFFIRMED BY STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN, WHICH WAS IN FACT AND IN EVERY WAY A LEGAL DEFENSE TO MY WIFE’S CLAIM, as showing no cause of action. The affidavit affirmed that my wife sold her share, and therefore has no legal standing under the Company Act to pursue her petition to wind her company. IS THIS NOT A DEFENSE TO MY WIFE’S APPLICATION TO WIND UP HER COMPANY ?

How is it possible for a judge of the highest court of Malaysia, namely the Malaysian Federal Court to be so ignorant of the Law that she is unable to understand that a striking out of a petition that shows no cause of action means just that and that no defense is necessary TO DISMISS THE PETITION that shows no cause of action; but in my wife’s case Stephen Lim Cheng Ban HAD IN FACT PUT IN A DEFENSE, that my wife had sold her share. TAKE NOTICE THAT RESPONDENT STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN HAD PUT IN A DEFENSE; SO WHAT IS THE JUSTIFICATION IN LAW FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MHD. ALI TO DENY MY WIFE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND THAT RESPONDENT STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN PROVE HIS DEFENSE ? This is the crux that is the ground for my charge against Judge Zainon for her abuse of her judicial powers.

This forms the ground for my charge against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for abuse of her judicial powers.

Your’s faithfully,


yapchongyee,

COPY : To, President of Court of Appeal, Chief Justice of Malaysia, President & Secretary of Malaysian Bar, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, Attorney General, Malaysia; randomly to legal practitioners and Malaysian bloggers.